ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003January 01, 2003 PDT
Should Attorneys Be Footsoldiers in the War on Corporate Fraud?
Should Attorneys Be Footsoldiers in the War on Corporate Fraud?
Articles in Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003
Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003
- Pre-dispute Arbitration Clauses-Can They All Be Right?Jay Folberg
- Arbitration: Trial by Other Means or Settlement by Other Means?Joshua P Davis
- The Rise and Spread of Mandatory Arbitration as a Substitute for the Jury TrialJean R Sternlight
- Contractual Arbitration, Mandatory Arbitration, and State Constitutional Jury-Trial RightsStephen J Ware
- Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion PrinciplesDavid S Schwartz
- Employment Arbitration and Workplace JusticeLewis L Maltby
- California Arbitration Reform: The AftermathRuth V Glick
- Presumptions and Burden of Proof: Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of EvidenceMiguel A Mendez
- Should Attorneys Be Footsoldiers in the War on Corporate Fraud?Douglas Michael Mcmanamon
Douglas Michael Mcmanamon, Should Attorneys Be Footsoldiers in the War on Corporate Fraud?, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 9 (2003).