This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
University of San Francisco Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Print Archive
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Symposium
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:46292/feed
ISSN 0042-0018
Print Archive
Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003January 01, 2003 PDT

Arbitration: Trial by Other Means or Settlement by Other Means?

Joshua P Davis,
Arbitration

Articles in Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003

Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003
  • Pre-dispute Arbitration Clauses-Can They All Be Right?
    Jay Folberg
  • Arbitration: Trial by Other Means or Settlement by Other Means?
    Joshua P Davis
  • The Rise and Spread of Mandatory Arbitration as a Substitute for the Jury Trial
    Jean R Sternlight
  • Contractual Arbitration, Mandatory Arbitration, and State Constitutional Jury-Trial Rights
    Stephen J Ware
  • Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion Principles
    David S Schwartz
  • Employment Arbitration and Workplace Justice
    Lewis L Maltby
  • California Arbitration Reform: The Aftermath
    Ruth V Glick
  • Presumptions and Burden of Proof: Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence
    Miguel A Mendez
  • Should Attorneys Be Footsoldiers in the War on Corporate Fraud?
    Douglas Michael Mcmanamon
University of San Francisco Law Review
Joshua P Davis, Arbitration: Trial by Other Means or Settlement by Other Means?, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 2 (2003).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system