ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003January 01, 2003 PDT
Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion Principles
Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion Principles
Articles in Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003
Vol. 38, Issue 1, 2003
- Pre-dispute Arbitration Clauses-Can They All Be Right?Jay Folberg
- Arbitration: Trial by Other Means or Settlement by Other Means?Joshua P Davis
- The Rise and Spread of Mandatory Arbitration as a Substitute for the Jury TrialJean R Sternlight
- Contractual Arbitration, Mandatory Arbitration, and State Constitutional Jury-Trial RightsStephen J Ware
- Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion PrinciplesDavid S Schwartz
- Employment Arbitration and Workplace JusticeLewis L Maltby
- California Arbitration Reform: The AftermathRuth V Glick
- Presumptions and Burden of Proof: Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of EvidenceMiguel A Mendez
- Should Attorneys Be Footsoldiers in the War on Corporate Fraud?Douglas Michael Mcmanamon
David S Schwartz, Understanding Remedy-Stripping Arbitration Clauses: Validity, Arbitrability, and Preclusion Principles, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 5 (2003).