ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009January 01, 2009 PDT
Resolving Boundary Disputes in California: A Radical Reassessment in Light of Proposition 13
Resolving Boundary Disputes in California: A Radical Reassessment in Light of Proposition 13
JACK I. GARVEY,
Articles in Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009
Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009
- Are Law Schools Racist?-Part IIDAN SUBOTNIK
- Getting Real: A Reply to Dan SubotnikRICHARD DELGADO
- Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? and the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About RaceRHONDA V. MAGEE
- Friends as Co-ParentsJESSICA R. FEINBERG
- Resolving Boundary Disputes in California: A Radical Reassessment in Light of Proposition 13JACK I. GARVEY
- Empty Promises? How State Procedural Rules Block LGBT Minors from Vindicating Their Substantive RightsSARA JERUSS
- "Chipping Away": The Misguided Trend Toward Resolving Merits Disputes as Part of the Class Certification CalculusSTEIG D. OLSON
- Abortion Rights for ICE Detainees: Evaluating Constitutional Challenges to Restrictions on the Right to Abortion for Women in ICE DetentionALEXANDRIA WALDEN
JACK I. GARVEY, Resolving Boundary Disputes in California: A Radical Reassessment in Light of Proposition 13, 43 U.S.F. L. Rev. 5 (2009).