ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009January 01, 2009 PDT
Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? and the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About Race
Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? and the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About Race
RHONDA V. MAGEE,
Articles in Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009
Vol. 43, Issue 4, 2009
- Are Law Schools Racist?-Part IIDAN SUBOTNIK
- Getting Real: A Reply to Dan SubotnikRICHARD DELGADO
- Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? and the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About RaceRHONDA V. MAGEE
- Friends as Co-ParentsJESSICA R. FEINBERG
- Resolving Boundary Disputes in California: A Radical Reassessment in Light of Proposition 13JACK I. GARVEY
- Empty Promises? How State Procedural Rules Block LGBT Minors from Vindicating Their Substantive RightsSARA JERUSS
- "Chipping Away": The Misguided Trend Toward Resolving Merits Disputes as Part of the Class Certification CalculusSTEIG D. OLSON
- Abortion Rights for ICE Detainees: Evaluating Constitutional Challenges to Restrictions on the Right to Abortion for Women in ICE DetentionALEXANDRIA WALDEN
RHONDA V. MAGEE, Competing Narratives, Competing Jurisprudences: Are Law Schools Racist? And the Case for an Integral Critical Approach to Thinking, Talking, Writing, and Teaching About Race, 43 U.S.F. L. Rev. 3 (2009).