ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2006January 01, 2006 PDT
Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and Clarke
Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and Clarke
Philip N. S. Rumney,
Articles in Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2006
Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2006
- Causation and Attenuation in the Slavery Reparations DebateKaimipono David Wenger
- Lost in the Shuffle: State-Recognized Tribes and the Tribal Gaming IndustryAlexis KoenigJonathan Stein
- Antitrust Law on the Borderland of Language and Market Definition: Is There a Separate Spanish-Language Radio Market? A Case Study of the Merger of Univision and Hispanic Broadcasting CorporationCatherine J. K. Sandoval
- The Instrumental Value of Beauty in the Pursuit of JusticeNancy Perkins Spyke
- Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and ClarkePhilip N. S. Rumney
- An Undue Burden on an Otherwise Feasible Defense: California Courts’ Burden on the Defendant Moving for Summary Judgment Based on Federal Preemption in Certain Medical Device CasesJames E. Heffner
- California State Disability Insurance: Privatization Is the Answer to Employee WoesKelly L. Knudson
Philip N. S. Rumney, Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and Clarke, 40 U.S.F. L. Rev. 5 (2006).