ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2006January 01, 2006 PDT
Causation and Attenuation in the Slavery Reparations Debate
Causation and Attenuation in the Slavery Reparations Debate
Kaimipono David Wenger,
Slavery ReparationsAttenuation in ReparationsMass TortCausationLoss of Chance TheoryMarket Share Liability
Articles in Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2006
Vol. 40, Issue 2, 2006
- Causation and Attenuation in the Slavery Reparations DebateKaimipono David Wenger
- Lost in the Shuffle: State-Recognized Tribes and the Tribal Gaming IndustryAlexis KoenigJonathan Stein
- Antitrust Law on the Borderland of Language and Market Definition: Is There a Separate Spanish-Language Radio Market? A Case Study of the Merger of Univision and Hispanic Broadcasting CorporationCatherine J. K. Sandoval
- The Instrumental Value of Beauty in the Pursuit of JusticeNancy Perkins Spyke
- Is Coercive Interrogation of Terrorist Suspects Effective? A Response to Bagaric and ClarkePhilip N. S. Rumney
- An Undue Burden on an Otherwise Feasible Defense: California Courts’ Burden on the Defendant Moving for Summary Judgment Based on Federal Preemption in Certain Medical Device CasesJames E. Heffner
- California State Disability Insurance: Privatization Is the Answer to Employee WoesKelly L. Knudson
Kaimipono David Wenger, Causation and Attenuation in the Slavery Reparations Debate, 40 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1 (2006).