ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2005January 01, 2005 PDT
Miller v. HCA, Inc.: Why the Emergent Circumstances Exception Is Threatening to the Best Interest of the Child Standard
Miller v. HCA, Inc.: Why the Emergent Circumstances Exception Is Threatening to the Best Interest of the Child Standard
Brienne Wesolek,
Articles in Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2005
Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2005
- Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: A Proposal for a Layered Approach to Regulating Private Military CompaniesDeven R. Desai
- Duck When a Conflict of Interest Blinds You: Judicial Conflicts of Interest in the Matters of Scalia and GinsburgMarianne M. JenningsNim Razook
- Free But Not Independent: The Real First Amendment Issue for the PressJonathan Mermin
- Raining on the Litigation Parade: Is It Time to Stop Litigant Abuse of the Fraud on the Court Doctrine?Hollee S. Temple
- Transnational Constitutionalism in the United States: Toward a Worldwide Use of Interpretive Modes of Comparative ReasoningPo-Jen Yap
- Imaginary Intent: The California Supreme Court’s Search for a Specific Legislative Intent That Does Not ExistJason Horst
- Miller v. HCA, Inc.: Why the Emergent Circumstances Exception Is Threatening to the Best Interest of the Child StandardBrienne Wesolek
Brienne Wesolek, Miller v. HCA, Inc.: Why the Emergent Circumstances Exception Is Threatening to the Best Interest of the Child Standard, 39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 7 (2005).