ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2005January 01, 2005 PDT
Imaginary Intent: The California Supreme Court’s Search for a Specific Legislative Intent That Does Not Exist
Imaginary Intent: The California Supreme Court’s Search for a Specific Legislative Intent That Does Not Exist
Jason Horst,
Legislative IntentStatutory InterpretationIn Re Jorge MIn re JenningsCalifornia Penal CodeCalifornia Supreme Court
Articles in Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2005
Vol. 39, Issue 4, 2005
- Have Your Cake and Eat It Too: A Proposal for a Layered Approach to Regulating Private Military CompaniesDeven R. Desai
- Duck When a Conflict of Interest Blinds You: Judicial Conflicts of Interest in the Matters of Scalia and GinsburgMarianne M. JenningsNim Razook
- Free But Not Independent: The Real First Amendment Issue for the PressJonathan Mermin
- Raining on the Litigation Parade: Is It Time to Stop Litigant Abuse of the Fraud on the Court Doctrine?Hollee S. Temple
- Transnational Constitutionalism in the United States: Toward a Worldwide Use of Interpretive Modes of Comparative ReasoningPo-Jen Yap
- Imaginary Intent: The California Supreme Court’s Search for a Specific Legislative Intent That Does Not ExistJason Horst
- Miller v. HCA, Inc.: Why the Emergent Circumstances Exception Is Threatening to the Best Interest of the Child StandardBrienne Wesolek
Jason Horst, Imaginary Intent: The California Supreme Court’s Search for a Specific Legislative Intent That Does Not Exist, 39 U.S.F. L. Rev. 6 (2005).