Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js

This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
University of San Francisco Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Print Archive
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Symposium
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:4135/feed
ISSN 0042-0018
Print Archive
Vol. 49, Issue 2, 2015January 01, 2015 PDT

Betting on the Client: Alternative Litigation Funding is an Ethically Risky Proposition for Attorneys and Clients

Carol Langford,

Articles in Vol. 49, Issue 2, 2015

Vol. 49, Issue 2, 2015
  • Betting on the Client: Alternative Litigation Funding is an Ethically Risky Proposition for Attorneys and Clients
    Carol Langford
  • Choice of Law in Lawyer Discipline: Excursions Into the Dismal Swamp
    Charles W. Wolfram
  • Crowdfunded Justice: On the Potential Benefits and Challenges of Crowdfunding as a Litigation Financing Tool
    Manuel A. Gomez
  • Five Stages of Patent Grief to Achieve 3D Printing Acceptance
    Nicole A. Syzdek
  • Fracking and the Public Trust Doctrine: This Land Is Their Land, But After Robinson, Might This Land Really Be Our Land?
    Alexander Bukac
  • Death as Liberty
    Christina Q. Nguyen
University of San Francisco Law Review
Carol Langford, Betting on the Client: Alternative Litigation Funding Is an Ethically Risky Proposition for Attorneys and Clients, 49 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1 (2015).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system