ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 46, Issue 1, 2010January 01, 2010 PDT
Healthcare Reform’s Mandatory Medical Loss Ratio: Constitutionality, Policy, and Implementation
Healthcare Reform’s Mandatory Medical Loss Ratio: Constitutionality, Policy, and Implementation
Articles in Vol. 46, Issue 1, 2010
Vol. 46, Issue 1, 2010
- How Dykes on Bikes Got It Right: Procedural Inequities Inherent in the Trademark Office’s Review of Disparaging TrademarksJessica M. Kiser
- Tribal Court Convictions and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines: Respect for Tribal Courts and Tribal People in Federal SentencingBarbara Creel
- Earth Jurisprudence and the Story of Oil: Intergenerational Justice for the Post-Petroleum PeriodJudith E. Koons
- Healthcare Reform’s Mandatory Medical Loss Ratio: Constitutionality, Policy, and ImplementationWesley D. Markham
- Desperate Times Don’t Always Call for Desperate Measures: Professional Engineers v. Schwarzenegger Through the Lens of the Contract ClauseRachel Moroski
- Replacement Justice on the United States Supreme Court: The Use of Temporary Justices to Resolve the Recusal ConundrumNoah M. Schubert
- Out of the Shadows, Into the Light: Preventing Workplace Discrimination Against Medical Marijuana UsersElizabeth Hurwitz
Wesley D. Markham, Healthcare Reform’s Mandatory Medical Loss Ratio: Constitutionality, Policy, and Implementation, 46 U.S.F. L. Rev. 4 (2010).