ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 42, Issue 3, 2008January 01, 2008 PDT
Revisiting the Application of the Exclusionary Rule to the Good Faith Exceptions in Light of Hudson v.Michigan
Revisiting the Application of the Exclusionary Rule to the Good Faith Exceptions in Light of Hudson v.Michigan
Articles in Vol. 42, Issue 3, 2008
Vol. 42, Issue 3, 2008
- The Effects that Mediator Styles Impose on Neutrality and Impartiality Requirements of MediationSusan Nauss Exon
- Revisiting the Application of the Exclusionary Rule to the Good Faith Exceptions in Light of Hudson v.MichiganShenequa L. Grey
- Payday Lending: Can "Reputable" Banks End Cycles of Debt?Michael Kenneth
- The Link Between Carolene Products and Griswold: How the Right to Privacy Protects Popular Practices from Democratic FailuresAlan James Kluegel
- Taking Attorney-Client Communications (and Therefore Clients) SeriouslyEli Wald
- A Right in Search of a Coherent Rationale-Conceptualizing Persona in a Comparative Context: The United States Right of Publicity and German Personality RightsEllen S. Bass
- Enforcing Femininity: How Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Co. Leaves Women in Typically Female Jobs Vulnerable to Workplace Sex DiscriminationAmy Lifson-Leu
Shenequa L. Grey, Revisiting the Application of the Exclusionary Rule to the Good Faith Exceptions in Light of Hudson v.Michigan, 42 U.S.F. L. Rev. 2 (2008).