ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 42, Issue 4, 2008January 01, 2008 PDT
The Fallacy of Mandating Contraceptive Equity: Why Laws That Protect Women with Health Insurance Deepen Institutional Discrimination
The Fallacy of Mandating Contraceptive Equity: Why Laws That Protect Women with Health Insurance Deepen Institutional Discrimination
Phyra M. McCandless,
Articles in Vol. 42, Issue 4, 2008
Vol. 42, Issue 4, 2008
- Benefits From Private Antitrust Enforcement: An Analysis of Forty CasesRobert H. LandeJoshua P. Davis
- Globalization and Trade Initiatives in the Arab World: Historical Context, Progress to Date, and Prospects for the FutureSusan L. Sakmar
- Race and Religion in the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial DiscriminationJosé A. Lindgren Alves
- Sentencing Our Children to Die in Prison: Global Law and PracticeConnie De La VegaMichelle Leighton
- The Thirteenth Amendment and Access to Education for Children of Undocumented Workers: A New Look at Plyler v. DoeMaria L. OntiverosJoshua R. Drexler
- A Chinese American Seat at the Table: Examining Race in the San Francisco Unified School DistrictCynthia Der
- The Fallacy of Mandating Contraceptive Equity: Why Laws That Protect Women with Health Insurance Deepen Institutional DiscriminationPhyra M. McCandless
Phyra M. McCandless, The Fallacy of Mandating Contraceptive Equity: Why Laws That Protect Women with Health Insurance Deepen Institutional Discrimination, 42 U.S.F. L. Rev. 7 (2008).