ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2007January 01, 2007 PDT
Relevance: Definition and Limitations-Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence
Relevance: Definition and Limitations-Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence
Articles in Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2007
Vol. 42, Issue 2, 2007
- The Great American Makeover: The Sexing Up and Dumbing Down of Women's Work After Jespersen v. Harrah's Operating Company, Inc.Dianne Avery
- The Bankruptcy Clause and the Eleventh Amendment: An Uncertain Boundary Between Federalism and State SovereigntyDaniel Austin
- Ending Chronic Homelessness in America's Major Cities-The Justice Systems' DutyRobert Coates
- Relevance: Definition and Limitations-Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of EvidenceMiguel A. Méndez
- Voices from the Workplace: Oakwood Healthcare, Inc. and the Rollback of Labor Rights Under the Current National Labor Relations BoardEric Wiesner
- A Better Approach to Juvenile Sex Offender Registration in CaliforniaChristina Rule
- Valuation of the Family Home: Why Feminist Theory Supports the Exclusive Use of Appraisers as Experts When the Wife Wants to Keep the HomeMarisa San Filippo
Miguel A. Méndez, Relevance: Definition and Limitations-Conforming the California Evidence Code to the Federal Rules of Evidence, 42 U.S.F. L. Rev. 4 (2007).