This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
University of San Francisco Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Print Archive
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Symposium
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:46292/feed
ISSN 0042-0018
Print Archive
Vol. 41, Issue 1, 2006January 01, 2006 PDT

Authentication and the Best and Secondary Evidence Rules

Miguel A Mendez,
California evidence codefederal rules of evidenceauthenticationbest rulesecondary rule

Articles in Vol. 41, Issue 1, 2006

Vol. 41, Issue 1, 2006
  • Authentication and the Best and Secondary Evidence Rules
    Miguel A Mendez
  • Supplemental Jurisdiction over Permissive Counterclaims in Light of Exxon v. Allapattah
    Graham M. Beck
  • Legislative Inconsistency: California's Good Cause Statutory Exceptions as a Step Back in the Effort to Improve Court Access for Non-English Speaking Civil Litigants
    Nicholas P. Tsukamaki
University of San Francisco Law Review
Miguel A Mendez, Authentication and the Best and Secondary Evidence Rules, 41 U.S.F. L. Rev. 1 (2006).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system