This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
University of San Francisco Law Review
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Current Issue
    • Print Archive
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Symposium
  • search
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:26255/feed
ISSN 0042-0018
Print Archive
Vol. 40, Issue 4, 2006January 01, 2006 PDT

The Role of Empirical Evidence in Evaluating the Wisdom of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

James D. Cox,
Sarbanes-Oxley ActAccounting StandardsAuditors

Articles in Vol. 40, Issue 4, 2006

Vol. 40, Issue 4, 2006
  • Federalism in Securities Regulation: A Brief Introduction and Reflection
    Christopher M. Wood
  • Federalism in Securities Regulation: An Economist’s Perspective
    Joseph E. Stiglitz
  • The Role of Empirical Evidence in Evaluating the Wisdom of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
    James D. Cox
  • From Incongruity to Cooperative Federalism
    Reza Dibadj
  • Federalism in Corporate/Securities Law: Reflections on Delaware, California, and State Regulation of Insider Trading
    Donald C. Langevoort
University of San Francisco Law Review
James D. Cox, The Role of Empirical Evidence in Evaluating the Wisdom of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 40 U.S.F. L. Rev. 3 (2006).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system