A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction Proceedings

Megan K. Rosichan

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Print Archive

Vol. 38, Issue 4, 2004

January 01, 2004 PDT

A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction Proceedings

Megan K. Rosichan,

Death Penalty/Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

University of San Francisco Law Review

Megan K. Rosichan, A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction Proceedings, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 5 (2004).