ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 38, Issue 4, 2004January 01, 2004 PDT
A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction Proceedings
A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction Proceedings
Articles in Vol. 38, Issue 4, 2004
Vol. 38, Issue 4, 2004
- Extreme Sports and Assumption of Risk: A BlueprintDavid Horton
- Abstinence-Only Adolescent Education: Ineffective, Unpopular, and UnconstitutionalJames McGrath
- Strengthening Article 20Merle H Weiner
- The Keta Taylor Colby Death Penalty ProjectSteve Shatz
- A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction ProceedingsMegan K. Rosichan
- Who's Minding the Nonprofit Store: Does Sarbanes-Oxley Have Anything to Offer Nonprofits?Jane Heath
- Blurring Lines: How Supplemental Jurisdiction Unknowingly Gave the World Ancillary Personal JurisdictionAdam Hofmann
- The ADA Takes On the Movie Industry: Do the Disabled Have a Right to the Best Seats in the House?Laura K McKibbin
Megan K. Rosichan, A Meaningless Ritual? The Due Process Mandate for the Provision of Competent Counsel in Arkansas Capital Post-Conviction Proceedings, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 5 (2004).