ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2004January 01, 2004 PDT
“Important” and “Irreversible” but Maybe Not “Unreviewable”: The Dilemma of Protecting Defendants’ Rights Through the Collateral Order Doctrine
“Important” and “Irreversible” but Maybe Not “Unreviewable”: The Dilemma of Protecting Defendants’ Rights Through the Collateral Order Doctrine
Articles in Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2004
Vol. 38, Issue 2, 2004
- A Civil Rights Task: Removing Barriers to Employment of Ex-convictsLeroy D Clark
- "Important" and "Irreversible" but Maybe Not "Unreviewable": The Dilemma of Protecting Defendants' Rights Through the Collateral Order DoctrineKristen B Gerdy
- With Malice Toward All: The Increased Lethality of Violence Reshapes Transferred Intent and Attempted Murder LawMitchell Keiter
- Physicians Policing Physicians: The Development of Medical Staff Peer Review Law at California HospitalsPhilip L Merkel
- Deferred Entry of Judgment: An Overlooked and Undervalued Benefit of Proposition 21Laron Hogg Haught
Kristen B Gerdy, “Important” and “Irreversible” but Maybe Not “Unreviewable”: The Dilemma of Protecting Defendants’ Rights Through the Collateral Order Doctrine, 38 U.S.F. L. Rev. 2 (2004).