ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2003January 01, 2003 PDT
Proving Discrimination After Croson and Adarand: “If It Walks Like a Duck”
Proving Discrimination After Croson and Adarand: “If It Walks Like a Duck”
Articles in Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2003
Vol. 37, Issue 4, 2003
- Lethal Injections: The Law, Science, and Politics of Syringe Access for Injection Drug UsersScott BurrisSteffanie A StrathdeeJon S Vernick
- Proving Discrimination After Croson and Adarand: "If It Walks Like a Duck"Derek M Alphran
- The Role of Judge and Jury: Conforming the Evidence Code to the Federal RulesMiguel A Mendez
- The Durban Conference Against Racism and Everyone's ResponsibilitiesJ.A. Lindgren Alvez
- Restoring Power to the Powerless: The Need to Reform California's Mandatory Mediation for Victims of Domestic ViolenceAlana Dunnigan
- Doe 1 v. City of Murrieta: How the California Court of Appeal Missed the Mark on Vicarious Liability for Sexual Torts Committed by On-Duty Police OfficersTara L Pennington
- Oregon v. Ashcroft: The Attorney General's Attempt to Override State Controlled Medical PracticeCasey Kaufman
Derek M Alphran, Proving Discrimination After Croson and Adarand: “If It Walks Like a Duck,” 37 U.S.F. L. Rev. 2 (2003).