ISSN 0042-0018
Vol. 36, Issue 2, 2002January 01, 2002 PDT
Toward a Robust Conception of “Independent Judgment”: Back to the Future?
Toward a Robust Conception of “Independent Judgment”: Back to the Future?
Articles in Vol. 36, Issue 2, 2002
Vol. 36, Issue 2, 2002
- Premeditation and Deliberation in California: Returning to a Distinction Without a DifferenceSuzanne Mounts
- Toward a Robust Conception of "Independent Judgment": Back to the Future?Harry G. Hutchison
- Has the Supreme Court Sounded the Death Knell for Jury Assessed Punitive Damages? A Critical Re-Examination of the American JuryLisa Litwiller
- The Evolution and Revolution of NapsterPeter Jan Honigsberg
- Regulations Against Corporate Tax Shelters: Should We Keep Them?Cecilia Chui
- The Theory of the Waiver Scale: An Argument Why Parents Should Be Able to Waive Their Children's Tort Liability ClaimsRobert S. Nelson
- The California Supreme Court Framework for Mandatory Arbitration Agreements: Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc.Bernard Finnegan
Harry G. Hutchison, Toward a Robust Conception of “Independent Judgment”: Back to the Future?, 36 U.S.F. L. Rev. 2 (2002).